[ Pareto-Optimal Data Center Operations ]
The complete map.
Not just the point.
Multi-objective optimization for data centers. The Pareto front that nobody else computes. Every trade-off, every season, one auditable result.
01 — The problem
Your data center has
competing objectives.
Current tools optimize one thing at a time. But you can't minimize PUE, minimize cost, maximize reliability, and comply with regulation simultaneously. You need to see the trade-offs.
Minimize PUE
Energy efficiency is mandatory to report — and soon, to label.
Minimize cooling cost
Cooling = 30–40% of energy. A 100MW facility can save €3–10M/year.
Maximize reliability
Every degree matters for hardware lifespan and SLA compliance.
Maximize throughput
AI workloads run 40–60°C hotter. Cooling is the bottleneck.
Comply with regulation
EU A-G rating labels mandatory from August 2027. 3,000+ DCs must report.
02 — Method
Model. Optimize. Decide.
Not a black box. Not a heuristic. A deterministic, reproducible Pareto front that you can audit, explain, and trust.
Model
We model your data center: floor plan, CRAC placement, IT load, local climate. A reduced-order thermal model calibrated with your real data. Fast, not full CFD. Validated.
Optimize
Our optimization engine explores the configuration space in minutes. 3–5 objectives, thousands of configurations, deterministic. Reproducible. Auditable.
Decide
The result: an interactive Pareto front. See how PUE changes if you raise supply temperature 2°C. See the cost of going from E to C rating. You decide. We give you the map.
03 — Services
Three lines, one engine.
From compliance to design. The same Pareto front methodology, adapted to each decision.
Compliance & Rating
Model your PUE, WUE, renewable fraction, waste heat reuse. Project your A-G rating. Generate EU-compliant reports with auditable trail.
"Your DC is rated E. Here's how to get to C."
Operational Optimization
Seasonal Pareto front: energy × cost × thermal risk. Quarterly re-optimization. Alerts when operation drifts from optimal.
"15–30% cooling energy reduction. Proven."
Thermal Design
Rack layout, CRAC placement, cooling technology selection (free cooling vs mechanical vs liquid). Pareto front of design alternatives: cost × PUE × redundancy.
"Don't over-provision. Optimize."
04 — Comparison
RL gives you a policy.
We give you the landscape.
For capex decisions and regulatory compliance, you need the full picture. Not a black box recommendation.
| RL / AI Phaidra, Vigilent | BMS / Rules Schneider, Siemens | CFD consultants Traditional | OPXIMA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Output | One policy (black box) | One config (heuristic) | One scenario (manual) | Pareto front complete map |
| Multi-objective | ✗ Single reward | ✗ Single-obj heuristic | ✗ Single scenario | ✓ 3–5 objectives |
| Explainability | ✗ Black box | △ Fixed rules | △ Depends on report | ✓ White box, deterministic |
| Audit trail | ✗ Not reproducible | △ Partial | ✗ Manual | ✓ Seed + params = same result |
| Speed | Real-time | Real-time | Days/run | Minutes/run |
| Use case | Operational control | Operational control | One-off design | Strategic decisions + compliance |
05 — Market
The market is real.
The regulation is now.
market (2025)
market (2025)
report PUE
savings potential
06 — EU Regulation
The clock is ticking.
First PUE report due
DCs >500 kW must report energy data to EU database.
Annual reporting mandatory
PUE, WUE, renewables, waste heat.
Energy Efficiency Package adopted
Rating scheme + minimum standards framework.
A-G labels mandatory
Public, in all EU languages. Operators must share on request.
Minimum performance standards review
Possible mandatory PUE thresholds.
Get started
Your data center has an
A-G rating. Do you know
what it is?
Opxima calculates your current rating, projects how to improve it, and generates the compliance report. No black box. No heuristics. The complete map.
REQUEST FREE AUDIT →